[PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

Update #2843. --- c-user/index.rst | 1 + c-user/self_contained_objects.rst | 337 ++ 2 files changed, 338 insertions(+) create mode 100644 c-user/self_contained_objects.rst diff --git a/c-user/index.rst b/c-user/index.rst index 7937042..4b7

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

This is a proposal for a new user API for self-contained objects which can be used also internally for device drivers and support libraries (e.g. bdbuf, Termios). -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax :

[PATCH] Remove CONFIGURE_SMP_APPLICATION

Enable the SMP support if CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS > 1. Update #2893. --- cpukit/libmisc/dummy/default-configuration.c| 2 -- cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h | 34 + cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/config.h | 8 ++ testsuites/smptes

[PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS to CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS since the SMP part is superfluous. Update #2894. --- cpukit/libmisc/dummy/default-configuration.c| 2 +- cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h | 83 + testsuites/smptests/smp01/system.h

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

The inclusion of SMP categorizes the option. Many, if not most, configure options have a second word which is the category. All the POSIX options include POSIX in the name, gnat, Go, etc. All of our services are rtems_CATEGORY. It isn't about the shortest name with RTEMS. It is about the clearest

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

On 01/02/17 14:53, Joel Sherrill wrote: The inclusion of SMP categorizes the option. Many, if not most, configure options have a second word which is the category. All the POSIX options include POSIX in the name, gnat, Go, etc. This is the only CONFIGURE_SMP_* option left, a category should co

[PATCH] Prefix confdefs.h internal def with an underscore

Close #2895. --- cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h | 803 ++--- 1 file changed, 350 insertions(+), 453 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h b/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h index fdfc7c0..eb121a8 100644 --- a/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h +++

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

On Feb 1, 2017 8:02 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: On 01/02/17 14:53, Joel Sherrill wrote: > The inclusion of SMP categorizes the option. Many, if not most, configure > options have a second word which is the category. All the POSIX options > include POSIX in t

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

On 01/02/17 15:22, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Feb 1, 2017 8:02 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > wrote: On 01/02/17 14:53, Joel Sherrill wrote: The inclusion of SMP categorizes the option. Many, if not most, configure options have a second w

Re: GSoC Mentors / Projects of Interest

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: >> * You removed the "Introduction" section. Any reason or just an oversight? >> * The 'status' field is gone too. But, I think the status is not >> needed in the ticket format. > > I removed the "Introduction" section by mistake. I'll inclu

Re: GSoC Mentors / Projects of Interest

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: > Hello, > > I'm unable to change the content of "Description" field on Trac. I > read https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TracTickets and couldn't find any > luck. I read a thread on Trac's mailing list > (https://lists.gt.net/trac/users/46376). Pe

Re: GSoC Mentors / Projects of Interest

Hi Gedare, I think we are not able to modify the content of tickets. I have tried the ticket I initialized before. I can only change properties summary and action. Best, Kuan-Hsun 2017-02-01 17:55 GMT+01:00 Gedare Bloom : > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Tanu Hari Dixit > wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: GSoC Mentors / Projects of Interest

> If you're logged in then you should see a small link "Modify ↓" just > above the ticket box. I clicked on the Modify link but it doesn't give me an option to edit the description. Thanks, Tanu Hari Dixit. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Kuan Hsun Chen wrote: > Hi Gedare, > > I think we are no

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:30 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > >> On 01/02/17 15:22, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 1, 2017 8:02 AM, "Sebastian Huber" >> > > wrote: >> >>On 01/02/17 14:53, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>The inclusion of SMP

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

- Chris Johns schrieb: > > > On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:30 pm, Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/02/17 15:22, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Feb 1, 2017 8:02 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > >> >> > wrote: > >> > >>On 01/02/17 14:53, Jo

Re: Regarding a beginner friendly bug

Thank you for pointing these out to me. I had a question, though. Why isn't the proposed patch applied in https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2353 ? Regards, Tanu Hari Dixit. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Tanu Hari Dixit, > > On 31/01/17 19:15, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: