On 16/12/16 05:22, Chris Johns wrote:
I already spend more than one man week in vain to do this
and eventually gave up.
What was the issue?
This two years ago. Maybe its now easier. The main issue was the i386 BSP.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178
On 15/12/16 23:34, Chris Johns wrote:
On 15/12/2016 18:02, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 14/12/16 22:15, Chris Johns wrote:
On 15/12/2016 00:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
[...]
Would the "tiny" footprint be smaller if all internal services
including compiler thread support are made C11? Could this
On 17/12/16 3:26 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 15/12/16 23:34, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 15/12/2016 18:02, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 14/12/16 22:15, Chris Johns wrote:
On 15/12/2016 00:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> [...]
Would the "tiny" footprint be smaller if all internal serv
On 17/12/16 3:15 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 16/12/16 05:22, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> I already spend more than one man week in vain to do this
>>> and eventually gave up.
>>
>> What was the issue?
>
> This two years ago. Maybe its now easier. The main issue was the i386 BSP.
>
I made s
hi,
I test binary semaphore used for mutex,but I find it can not block
my simple test code is
struct zynq_qspi
{
rtems_id sem_bus;
rtems_id sem_done;
bool inited;
const uint8_t *txbuf;
uint8_t *rxbuf;
int32_t bytes_to_transfer;
int32_t bytes_to_rec
