Re: [PATCH 02/12] score: Add ticks per second to configuration

2016-04-11 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Chris Johns schrieb: > On 8/04/2016 7:34 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/04/16 11:22, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> I don't think its feasible to avoid . Its now the only > >>> way to create a configuration. > >>> > >> > >> Sorry, but I do not like confdefs getting these values in this way.

Re: [PATCH 02/12] score: Add ticks per second to configuration

2016-04-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > - Chris Johns schrieb: > > On 8/04/2016 7:34 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 08/04/16 11:22, Chris Johns wrote: > > >>> I don't think its feasible to avoid . Its now the > only > > >>> way to

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Tool Updates

2016-04-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
I have pushed this. Thanks,. On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/04/2016 05:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> This patch series updates newlib to 2.4.0 for all targets. For most, >> this was done by changing the default. >> > > Looks good. Please push. > > Thanks > Chris > _

Tool Updates

2016-04-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I pushed a patch set that bumped the gcc and newlib version. The main point of the newlib update to 2.4.0 was to pick up the feature flag rework. This may result in new warnings in user code that was strictly non-conformant (or trips a bug in the feature flag rework). Please report issues. Als

Re: [PATCH 02/12] score: Add ticks per second to configuration

2016-04-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 11/04/2016 23:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: Ultimately we have to rely on something to do the right thing. The design issue is a struct and code in the score is dependent on something in a header in another file in another part of RTEMS, ie confdefs.h to actually work as expected. It is easy t

Re: [PATCH] [RSB] use updated newlib revision for or1k

2016-04-11 Thread Hesham Almatary
That's Ok, so please merge your patch and discard this one. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:40 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2016 7:11 PM, "Hesham Almatary" > wrote: > > > > This is the patch. It would conflict with Joel's [PATCH 3/5] > 4.12/rtems-or1k.bset: Update newlib to 2.4.0, so we ca

[PATCH] posix: Rename killinfo()

2016-04-11 Thread Sebastian Huber
Apparently killinfo() is not defined by POSIX, glibc or FreeBSD. Rename killinfo() to _POSIX_signals_Send() to cleary mark it as an internal function. --- cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/psignalimpl.h | 2 +- cpukit/posix/src/kill.c| 2 +- cpukit/posix/src/kill_r.c