It looks like there are more useful things in pipeline before raspberry pi
cam support.
Can anybody give me pointers/links to refer for porting ethernet support
and SD card support?
On Thursday 18 February 2016, soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de <
soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de> wrote:
> Am 2016-02-
Hi,
Congratulations to the coreboot team for selection in GSOC 2016.
I am interested in working on x86_64 BSP as GSOC2016 project with
RTEMS and with initial guidance from Joel as to how to get started, I
am working on the same.
Looking forward to working with the community for the same.
Regards
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Saket Sinha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Congratulations to the coreboot team for selection in GSOC 2016.
Sorry for the typo. I meant the RTEMS team. I worked for Coreboot last
year so still relate to with GSOC everytime mistakenly.
>
> I am interested in working on x86_64 B
Hi,
If you take a look here:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015#StudentsSummerofCodeTrackingTable you
can find the links to the reports and repositories of the previous GSoC.
Yurii Shevtsov was doing the work on the Ethernet/USB part for the pi.
Andre Marques worked on the SPI and SD-Card d
Hello Jan and Deval,
Às 20:24 de 29-02-2016, Jan Sommer escreveu:
Hi,
If you take a look here:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015#StudentsSummerofCodeTrackingTable you
can find the links to the reports and repositories of the previous GSoC.
Yurii Shevtsov was doing the work on the Etherne
Greetings,
I am currently removing the deprecated task variables and am having
issues deciding on what to do with the use
of task variables in the RPC implementation. The next email will include
a patch of my current tested and working progress.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Aun-Ali Zaidi
__
Hi
Just a reminder that there will be an RTEMS Open Class here in
Huntsville March 14-18. More details are here:
http://rtems.com/trainingschedule
If you are interested or have questions, feel free to ask me.
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
de
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am currently removing the deprecated task variables and am having issues
> deciding on what to do with the use
> of task variables in the RPC implementation. The next email will include a
> patch of my current tested and wor
$ grep -lR "task_var"
.git/objects/pack/pack-97a9b54f14bf9a5b8987276468b6bf120d1f2ab4.pack
c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/mvme5500/vectors/exceptionhandler.c
c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/gen5200/include/bestcomm.h
c/src/ada/rtems-tasks.adb
cpukit/librpc/src/rpc/svc.c
cpukit/librpc/src/rpc/rtems_rpc.c
cpukit
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote:
> $ grep -lR "task_var"
> .git/objects/pack/pack-97a9b54f14bf9a5b8987276468b6bf120d1f2ab4.pack
> c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/mvme5500/vectors/exceptionhandler.c
> c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/gen5200/include/bestcomm.h
> c/src/ada/rtems-tasks.adb
> c
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Saket Sinha
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Saket Sinha
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Congratulations to the coreboot team for selection in GSOC 2016.
>
> Sorry for the typo. I meant the RTEMS team. I worked for Coreboot last
> year so still relate to with G
Task variables were a feature of RTEMS' Tasks which functioned in the same way
as POSIX keys and TLS.
In addition to their scarce usage they are not SMP safe.
updates #2494.
---
c/src/ada/rtems-tasks.adb | 65 ---
c/src/ada/rtems-tasks.ads | 20
Before we remove the task variables, all remaining use cases must be
converted to use an alternative.
On 01/03/16 04:46, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote:
Task variables were a feature of RTEMS' Tasks which functioned in the same way
as POSIX keys and TLS.
In addition to their scarce usage they are not SMP
13 matches
Mail list logo
