Hi,
Sorry about the slow response. I have been travelling.
As Joel points out the current Makefile support for applications can not
continue forward in its current form. The method used grew to what it is
today and we now have something we cannot sustain. Any refactoring of
the building system fo
Chris,
thank you for your detailed posting. Having a stable build interface is
important for user acceptance. Setting it on a better-defined basis than
the current "it is as it is" makes sense.
But before we onnounce it, we should at least have a plan on how it will
look like. Otherwise we w
Hi
Now that we are past 4.11 branching (and needing a release cut),
it would be great if we could focus on finishing off the waf build
infrastructure for RTEMS.
If you have built the new network stack, you will have noticed
how much faster this builds with waf. There are ~800 files to
be built a
On 30/09/2015 12:22 am, Thomas Dörfler wrote:
> But before we onnounce it, we should at least have a plan on how it will
> look like. Otherwise we will generate lots of confusion, which does not
> lead to anything.
Yes this is important. A key feature of the waf build system for RTEMS
is getting t
