lwIP with RTEMS BBB

Hi All, I have written a blog explaining how to use lwIP with RTEMS. The BSP supported is BeagleBone Black(BBB). It basically has four steps 1. Build BBB BSP with cache disabled. 2. Build lwIP library. We can build it using RSB 3. Build driver library using RSB 4. Build the application All the

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Code refactor xilinx-zynq BSP MMU initialization

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 14/08/2015 7:44 am, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: >> > --- >> > >> > -BSP_START_DATA_SECTION static const arm_cp15_start_section_config >> > -zynq_mmu_config_table[] = { >> > +BSP_

SMC91111 CYG_ASSERT("Unexpected rx packet") on Phytec MPC5554

In my application using 4.11 I’ve started encountering a CYG_ASSERT() “Unexpected rx packet” assertion. I’m not sure what I’ve changed to cause it, or if it is an issue introduced by 4.11. I’ve seen it four times now, three times before any software change and once after the change described b

Version 197 of GSoC 2015 Student Table has been modified incorrectly

Hello: I've noticed that Version 197 of the GSoC 2015 Student Table, which can be found here https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015?version=197, has resulted in the deletion of some students' status updates (myself included). The latest version is Version 198. I was wondering what is the most ef

Re: Version 197 of GSoC 2015 Student Table has been modified incorrectly

sorry that I've brought some problems here. My browser had a wired crash and I didn't notice that some are deleted by accident. Should we revert or I just add them back?  On Aug 15, 2015, at 05:46 AM, Jarielle Catbagan wrote: Hello: I've noticed that Version 197 of the GSoC 2015 Student T

Re: Fwd: SMP support for Raspberry Pi 2

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On 8/11/2015 2:06 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would have to register the related mailbox interrupt and associate it >> with a handler that should be same as >> _SMP_Inter_processor_interrupt_handler(). Am I right? >> > >

GPIO broke a few ARM BSPs

Hi It looks like the gpio addition broke three BSPs: arm-lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth arm-lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram arm-lpc1768_mbed arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../../.././lib/ -B../../../../../.././lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../../../../../

Re: GPIO broke a few ARM BSPs

Hi, On 15 August 2015 at 23:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > It looks like the gpio addition broke three BSPs: > > arm-lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth > arm-lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram > arm-lpc1768_mbed > > > arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../../.././lib/ > -B../../../../../.././lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_et

[PATCH 1/2] Removed GPIO API from the libbsp/shared Makefile.

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/Makefile.am | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/Makefile.am b/c/src/lib/libbsp/Makefile.am index a039a98..3cab4d7 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/Makefile.am +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/Makefile.am @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ EXTRA_DIST = MERGE.

[PATCH 2/2] Added GPIO API sources to rpi Makefile

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/Makefile.am | 3 ++- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/preinstall.am | 4 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/Makefile.am b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/Makefile.am index 03be711..abb55a6 100

Pi2 Mailbox IRQs was Re: Fwd: SMP support for Raspberry Pi 2

Alan .. can you confirm what I am interpreting? On 08/15/2015 02:56 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Joel Sherrill mailto:joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>> wrote: On 08/15/2015 02:35 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: Hi I need some help with this. I am un

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Code refactor xilinx-zynq BSP MMU initialization

On 15/08/2015 8:14 pm, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Rohini Kulkarni > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 14/08/2015 7:44 am, Rohini Kulkarni wrot