The problem is that rtemsroset.bsd.nexus.content doesn't exist in
final elf. If I change driver's name in RTEMS_BSD_DEFINE_NEXUS_DEVICE
macro, linker will throw an error
(.rtemsroset.bsd.nexus.content+0x10): undefined reference to '%wrong
driver's name%'. Otherwise with correct name - no errors(war
In arm/shared/startup/linkcmds.base these barriers are used to add
gaps in the memory layout at link-time to accommodate for the size
requirements of the MMU. xbarrier aligns the executable region,
robarrier aligns the read-only memory, and rwbarrier aligns the
read-write memory.
On Tue, Aug 4, 20
These functions are called with interrupts disabled. However,
_CORE_mutex_Seize_interrupt_blocking() enables interrupts, so an isr
can preempt the thread, but but it will not be interleaved with
another thread because thread dispatching is disabled around the isr
enabled section. I don't believe su
Hi
I have started a Google Doc with notes which will evolve into a
blog post for the Google Open Source Program Office and a news
item for the RTEMS Project.
If you are a student or a mentor, then please pitch in. I should
have shared a Google doc with you today. If you didn't get an
invite, pin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
>
> On 31/07/15 14:51, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Is it possible to construct objects without an address via plain C++?
>>
>> Sorry I don't understand the question. Rephrase please?
>>
>> Global objects and objects of static storage du
For surrender we don't disable thread dispatching for uniprocessor. So is
that the thread can be interleaved?
Thanks,
Saurabh Gadia
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> These functions are called with interrupts disabled. However,
> _CORE_mutex_Seize_interrupt_blocking() enabl
Like this? Applies to at least master and 4.11.
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:37 -0400, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Can you file a ticket and refer/close it with the commit message? What
> versions should this be applied to?
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Nick Withers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The at