Re: qemu fails to build with RSB on CentOS 6

2015-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/04/2015 7:51 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Has anyone seen this failure? > > $ make > lt LINK vscclient > /usr/bin/ld: -f may not be used without -shared > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [vscclient] Error 1 > Is it related to .. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-disc

[PATCH 1/4] score: Add header to _Watchdog_Remove()

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Add watchdog header parameter to _Watchdog_Remove() to be in line with the other operations. Add _Watchdog_Remove_ticks() and _Watchdog_Remove_seconds() for convenience. Update #2307. --- cpukit/posix/src/alarm.c| 2 +- cpukit/posix/src/psignalunblockthread.c |

[PATCH 4/4] score: New timer server implementation

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Use mostly the standard watchdog operations. Use a system event for synchronization. This implementation is simpler and offers better SMP performance. Update #2307. --- cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/event.h | 5 + cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/timerimpl.h | 51 +- cpuki

[PATCH 2/4] score: Add _Watchdog_Acquire|Release|Flash()

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Update #2307. --- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/watchdogimpl.h | 30 + cpukit/score/src/watchdogadjust.c | 16 ++--- cpukit/score/src/watchdogadjusttochain.c| 8 +++ cpukit/score/src/watchdoginsert.c | 10 - cpukit

[PATCH 3/4] score: Add Watchdog_Iterator

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Rewrite the _Watchdog_Insert(), _Watchdog_Remove() and _Watchdog_Tickle() functions to use interator items to synchronize concurrent operations. This makes it possible to get rid of the global variables _Watchdog_Sync_level and _Watchdog_Sync_count which are a blocking point for scalable SMP solut

[PATCH] score: Refactor SMP cache manager support

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c | 175 +--- cpukit/score/Makefile.am| 1 + cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 33 -- cpukit/score/src/smpmulticastaction.c | 141 ++ testsuites/smptests/smpcache0

4.11 branch point

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, I think everything for the 4.11 release is now in the tree. It would be good to do the branch soon, since the watchdog changes and the FreeBSD timecounters should probably be not in the release. We can test and polish for the release in the branch. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains

Re: [PING][PATCH v2] Change the assert in _Thread_Dispatch_decrement_disable_level

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
I checked in a slightly modified version. On 16/04/15 16:27, Martin Galvan wrote: While cpu_self->thread_dispatch_disable_level shouldn't ever be zero, it would be better to check it before doing the decrement. Changes in v2: * Modified the asserts as requested in https://lists.rtems.org/pi

[PATCH v2] score: Refactor SMP cache manager support

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
v2: Update missing instruction routines. Test smpcache01 passes on NGMP. --- c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c | 224 +++- cpukit/score/Makefile.am| 1 + cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 33 +++- cpukit/score/src/smpmulticasta

Re: [PING][PATCH v2] Change the assert in _Thread_Dispatch_decrement_disable_level

2015-04-17 Thread Martin Galvan
Thanks a lot! On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I checked in a slightly modified version. > > > On 16/04/15 16:27, Martin Galvan wrote: >> >> While cpu_self->thread_dispatch_disable_level shouldn't ever be zero, it >> would be better to check it before doing the decrement.

Trac ticket delete.

2015-04-17 Thread Amar Takhar
We're getting hit with a lot of spam at the moment. Some may get through for those of you with permission you can delete a ticket. The location of the button is here: https://trac-hacks.org/attachment/ticket/10841/DeleteButton.png It will ask for a conformation. Amar.

Re: Trac ticket delete.

2015-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On April 17, 2015 7:58:02 AM CDT, Amar Takhar wrote: >We're getting hit with a lot of spam at the moment. Some may get >through for >those of you with permission you can delete a ticket. The location of >the >button is here: > > https://trac-hacks.org/attachment/ticket/10841/DeleteButton.pn

Re: 4.11 branch point

2015-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 4/17/2015 5:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I think everything for the 4.11 release is now in the tree. It would be > good to do the branch soon, since the watchdog changes and the FreeBSD > timecounters should probably be not in the release. We can test and > polish for the rele

Re: [PATCH 3/4] score: Add Watchdog_Iterator

2015-04-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
I'm not a big fan of this "watchdog_remove_it" terminology. Can I suggest the state be called something else like WATCHDOG_REMOVING or maybe WATCHDOG_TRANSIENT, and perhaps the actual removal function be renamed _Watchdog_Remove_internal() or something similar? Also, given the refactoring here and

Re: 4.11 branch point

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Joel Sherrill schrieb: > > > On 4/17/2015 5:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I think everything for the 4.11 release is now in the tree. It would be > > good to do the branch soon, since the watchdog changes and the FreeBSD > > timecounters should probably be not in the

Re: [PATCH 4/4] score: New timer server implementation

2015-04-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
Tested on / results? On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Use mostly the standard watchdog operations. Use a system event for > synchronization. This implementation is simpler and offers better SMP > performance. > > Update #2307. > --- > cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/e

Re: Trac ticket delete.

2015-04-17 Thread Amar Takhar
On 2015-04-17 07:59 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > What about the account that filed it? I added that user to the 'SPAM' group. This will trash any changes they make and have the system learn it as SPAM (Bayesian). Developers have access to do this noone else. Amar.

Re: [PATCH 3/4] score: Add Watchdog_Iterator

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
I will make it static. This helps to avoid an accidental usage. - Gedare Bloom schrieb: > I'm not a big fan of this "watchdog_remove_it" terminology. Can I > suggest the state be called something else like WATCHDOG_REMOVING or > maybe WATCHDOG_TRANSIENT, and perhaps the actual removal functi

Re: [PATCH 4/4] score: New timer server implementation

2015-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Gedare Bloom schrieb: > Tested on / results? The timer server is tested by the test suite. I use the sis and realview_pbx_a9_qemu BSPs for testing. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49

[PATCH] Beagle BSP Improvements (GPIO driver)

2015-04-17 Thread Ketul Shah
Hello, I have proposed in GSoC on Beagle BSP Improvements. As starting I started working for gpio driver development . At this stage I am able to demonstrate USR LEDs pattern. Videos of that can be found here on YouTube. https://youtu.be/B3mSsfo-PAQ & https://youtu.be/M1aKpOhUvv4. Herewith I hav

Re: [PATCH] Beagle BSP Improvements (GPIO driver)

2015-04-17 Thread Hesham ALMatary
Hi Ketul, I'd suggest you have a look at this page [1] to know about RTEMS coding conventions. [1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions Best, Hesham On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Ketul Shah wrote: > Hello, > > I have proposed in GSoC on Beagle BSP Improvements. As start

Re: Trac ticket delete.

2015-04-17 Thread Eduardo Silva
just my 5c: on our project we faced the same problem with Trac. Bots create accounts and start commenting tickets with Ads and general trash. The solution for us was to start using Github Issues, no more spam. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Amar Takhar wrote: > On 2015-04-17 07:59 -0500, Joel