Hello everybody,
there is small byproduct of TMS570 BSP implementation project.
I have looked at Automake generated CTAGS targets in the build
but I have have not find way to build global sources database
to have crossreferenced sources.
But if the BSP build is sucesfull than all sources includi
On 08/07/2014 09:38 PM, Kolja Waschk wrote:
---
cpukit/libcsupport/src/termios.c | 74 +++-
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libcsupport/src/termios.c b/cpukit/libcsupport/src/termios.c
index 2448ea1..d32ab74 100644
---
Hi,
The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_FRAME_POINTER is part of a cpu port defined
in cpu.h, but this macro seems to be unused. I don't know what the
purpose of it was intended. Anyway, it appears to be wrong for some
architectures (ARM and sparc64 at least, maybe others). Should we
remove the macro, or find
On 8/8/2014 8:54 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi,
> The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_FRAME_POINTER is part of a cpu port defined
> in cpu.h, but this macro seems to be unused. I don't know what the
> purpose of it was intended. Anyway, it appears to be wrong for some
> architectures (ARM and sparc64 at least
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On 8/8/2014 8:54 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_FRAME_POINTER is part of a cpu port defined
>> in cpu.h, but this macro seems to be unused. I don't know what the
>> purpose of it was intended. Anyway, it appears t
On 8/8/2014 9:38 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
> wrote:
>> On 8/8/2014 8:54 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_FRAME_POINTER is part of a cpu port defined
>>> in cpu.h, but this macro seems to be unused. I don't know what the
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 8/8/2014 9:38 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/8/2014 8:54 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Hi,
The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_FRAME_POINTER is part of a cpu port defined
in
On 8/8/2014 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Joel Sherrill
> wrote:
>> On 8/8/2014 9:38 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
>>> wrote:
On 8/8/2014 8:54 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi,
> The macro CPU_ISR_PASSES_
Hi
This is a belated response to a comment from Sebastian where he
said you shouldn't call malloc() or rtems_workspace_allocate()
from a create extension. I am assuming this is due to the tight
calculations in confdefs.h now rather than a critical section issue.
Anyway, if you pull this logical
