Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/03/2017 18:06, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: Also, how can we change the number of cores operational? I found the --timeout option but none regarding the cores. Have a look at the `--jobs` option (try --help). The option is the same as the RSB and has its name. Maybe not the best name in this

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: > Hello Chris, All, > > Regarding the ticket https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2946 > for the test spcontext01 do we need to add a tag in a new .tcfg file ? > If so what would be the name of the tcfg file? > > This is Chris' to answer. > Als

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-21 Thread Tanu Hari Dixit
Hello Chris, All, Regarding the ticket https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2946 for the test spcontext01 do we need to add a tag in a new .tcfg file ? If so what would be the name of the tcfg file? Also, can you please help me investigate why 5 more test fail? Thanks, Tanu Hari Dixit. On Tue, Mar 2

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-21 Thread Tanu Hari Dixit
> I noticed you have 17 tests more than I do enabled. How did you configure? ../../rtems/configure --target=sparc-rtems4.12 --enable-tests --enable-rtemsbsp=erc32 --prefix=/home/thd/development/rtems/install_path_erc32_alltest_new I used Joel's configuration, that is: ../../rtems/configure --targ

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 20/03/2017 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 18/03/17 21:52, Joel Sherrill wrote: FWIW here are my results for sparc/erc32: Passed: 548 Failed: 1 Timeouts: 5 Invalid:0 - Total:554 Failures: spcontext01.exe Yes, this is expected. Timeouts: fileio.exe top.

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-19 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/03/17 21:52, Joel Sherrill wrote: FWIW here are my results for sparc/erc32: Passed: 548 Failed: 1 Timeouts: 5 Invalid:0 - Total:554 Failures: spcontext01.exe Yes, this is expected. Timeouts: fileio.exe top.exe termios.exe capture.exe monitor.exe

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-19 Thread Chris Johns
On 19/03/2017 07:52, Joel Sherrill wrote: That is much better than yours and is really only the known spcontext01.exe failure. Please tag the test as expected-fail. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
exe > math.exe > crypt01.exe > fsdosfsformat01.exe > mdosfs_fstime.exe > mimfs_fsrdwr.exe > > Regards, > Tanu Hari Dixit. > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 18/3/17 11:46 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> I just ran tests

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
ards, Tanu Hari Dixit. On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 18/3/17 11:46 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> I just ran tests and observe the following on erc32 under gdb, can >> anyone confirm/replicate the timeouts and failure, and know why this >> is happening? &

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-18 Thread Tanu Hari Dixit
On 18/3/17 11:46 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> I just ran tests and observe the following on erc32 under gdb, can >> anyone confirm/replicate the timeouts and failure, and know why this >> is happening? > > How many cores are you using with rtems-test and so how many tests are

Re: timeouts and failure

2017-03-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 18/3/17 11:46 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I just ran tests and observe the following on erc32 under gdb, can > anyone confirm/replicate the timeouts and failure, and know why this > is happening? How many cores are you using with rtems-test and so how many tests are running in parallel?

timeouts and failure

2017-03-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
I just ran tests and observe the following on erc32 under gdb, can anyone confirm/replicate the timeouts and failure, and know why this is happening? Passed: 554 Failed: 1 Timeouts: 6 Invalid:0 Total:561 Result: timeoutTime: 0:03:00.219154 fsdosfsformat01.exe Result: timeout