Re: testing order for rtems-libbsd

2015-06-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 6/23/2015 2:19 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/06/15 08:28, Chris Johns wrote: On 23/06/2015 3:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/06/15 01:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I have it built now for pc386 but some tests run and others don't. Any suggestions on the order to run tests in from

Re: testing order for rtems-libbsd

2015-06-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/06/15 08:28, Chris Johns wrote: On 23/06/2015 3:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/06/15 01:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I have it built now for pc386 but some tests run and others don't. Any suggestions on the order to run tests in from simplest to most complex? The ones covered by

Re: testing order for rtems-libbsd

2015-06-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 23/06/2015 3:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 23/06/15 01:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have it built now for pc386 but some tests run and others don't. >> Any suggestions on the order to run tests in from simplest to >> most complex? >> > > The ones covered by a "make run_test

Re: testing order for rtems-libbsd

2015-06-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/06/15 01:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I have it built now for pc386 but some tests run and others don't. Any suggestions on the order to run tests in from simplest to most complex? The ones covered by a "make run_tests" should work (there is a known issue with selectpollkqueue01). -

testing order for rtems-libbsd

2015-06-22 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I have it built now for pc386 but some tests run and others don't. Any suggestions on the order to run tests in from simplest to most complex? -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTE