Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

Hi, Thank you for this post. On 14/1/19 4:46 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > --- > without coverage > --- > ] QEMU 2.4.1 monitor - type 'help' for more information > ] (qemu) QEMU 2.4.1 monitor - type 'help' for more information > ] (qemu) > ] (qemu)  > [ 2/13] p:0  f:0  u:0  e:0  I:0 

Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 03:39, Chris Johns wrote: > On 13/1/19 5:55 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > With the recent change to the qemu

Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

On 13/1/19 5:55 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid > when > > running rtem

Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Chris Johns wrote: > On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid > when > > running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine > when the > > coverage option is ena

Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid when > running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine when > the > coverage option is enabled. > What are the command lines for each run? Chris

rtems-test : getting result invalid

Hi, With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid when running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine when the coverage option is enabled. == Passed: 1 Failed: 0 User Input: 0 Expected Fail: 0 In