> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> > more resilient.
> >
>
> I
> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> > more resilient.
> >
>
> I
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore
> wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller
> were more resilient.
> >
>
> I also changed "default-network-init.h" to assert rtems_bsd_initialize()
> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> more resilient.
>
I also changed "default-network-init.h" to assert rtems_bsd_initialize() worked.
sc = rtems_bsd_initialize();
assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCES
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:18 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
> I just rebased to "6-freebsd-12". This change:
>
> ###
> commit 62e0ca8283603573d42a0f15da044cd406a2f00a
> Author: Kinsey Moore
> Date: Tue Jan 23 13:25:45 2024 -0600
>
> rtemsbsd/rtems: Check function return values
> ###
> [dufault@g
I just rebased to "6-freebsd-12". This change:
###
commit 62e0ca8283603573d42a0f15da044cd406a2f00a
Author: Kinsey Moore
Date: Tue Jan 23 13:25:45 2024 -0600
rtemsbsd/rtems: Check function return values
###
[dufault@gen6 rtems-libbsd]$ git diff 6514d561587fd1527fe6a26cb43e6b5742c8c779
rte
