It seems that the libstdc++ configure script already detects that for
RTEMS the generic atomic built-ins are available and doesn't select the
CPU-specific header file. So, this stuff in
libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h looks like dead code.
On 09/09/16 21:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I am
Hello,
I was a bit surprised to find this special case for RTEMS in libstdc++
on m68k:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2016-09/msg00017.html
Any objections to eliminate this special case and simply use the generic
implementation? We have to check if the atomic operations for our m68k
(or C
