On 14/12/14 23:28, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/12/2014 2:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On December 12, 2014 9:12:53 AM CST, Anthony Green
wrote:
Joel Sherrill writes:
Hi
Do we need a newer binutils?
Yes.. we're still waiting for binutils 2.25. It branched last month,
but I don't know whe
On 13/12/2014 2:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On December 12, 2014 9:12:53 AM CST, Anthony Green wrote:
Joel Sherrill writes:
Hi
Do we need a newer binutils?
Yes.. we're still waiting for binutils 2.25. It branched last month,
but I don't know when it will be ready. Do you have a mechan
On December 12, 2014 9:12:53 AM CST, Anthony Green wrote:
>Joel Sherrill writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Do we need a newer binutils?
>
>Yes.. we're still waiting for binutils 2.25. It branched last month,
>but I don't know when it will be ready. Do you have a mechanism to
>apply patches in your test f
Joel Sherrill writes:
> Hi
>
> Do we need a newer binutils?
Yes.. we're still waiting for binutils 2.25. It branched last month,
but I don't know when it will be ready. Do you have a mechanism to
apply patches in your test framework? If so, I can supply the patch.
Thanks,
AG
>
> /users
Hi
Do we need a newer binutils?
/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/moxie-rtems4.11-gcc-4.9.2-newlib-de616601501c4f82968683e80c112604a2d40222-1/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/moxie-rtems4.11-gcc-4.9.2-newlib-de616601501c4
