Re: broken gcc 5.2

2015-09-18 Thread Daniel Gutson
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > there was a discussion about this on this mailing list. I think the result > was that GCC is working as intended: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/011879.html Yes. Semantic is changed but after the di

Re: broken gcc 5.2

2015-09-18 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Daniel, there was a discussion about this on this mailing list. I think the result was that GCC is working as intended: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/011879.html On 17/09/15 21:39, Daniel Gutson wrote: Hi, we are working towards compiling RTEMS for gcc 5.2 (sinc

broken gcc 5.2

2015-09-17 Thread Daniel Gutson
Hi, we are working towards compiling RTEMS for gcc 5.2 (since we are working in a fork of the latter). We found a bug that Sebastian previously found, which I reported here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67618 Not only it causes calloc() to call itself (recursively), but the (arg