Re: _Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt

2014-07-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
sible of this new overhead is an object in the bss >> section: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I want to know what >> is >> that, is there some documentation of it?, Can I disable it? > With respect to this item there is no overhead. Only the memory l

Re: _Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt

2014-07-10 Thread Gabriel Ibarra
y updated the last version of RTEMS and now I have more overhead, I >> found that the responsible of this new overhead is an object in the bss >> section: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I want to know >> what is >> that, is there some documentation o

Re: _Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt

2014-07-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
ction: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I want to know what is that, is there some documentation of it?, Can I disable it? With respect to this item there is no overhead. Only the memory location moved from the workspace to the BSS section. You can configure fewer priority levels to save s

_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt

2014-07-10 Thread Gabriel Ibarra
Hello, I'm working with a board with a few amount of RAM (lpc1768- 32k), I recently updated the last version of RTEMS and now I have more overhead, I found that the responsible of this new overhead is an object in the bss section: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I wa

_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt

2014-07-10 Thread Gabriel Ibarra
Hello, I'm working with a board with a few amount of RAM (lpc1768- 32k), I recently updated the last version of RTEMS and now I have more overhead, I found that the responsible of this new overhead is an object in the bss section: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I wa