On 23/04/2018 01:25, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> Yes, but both sets are unused. Would you
>
> 1. remove these unused sources
> 2. move them to bsps/arm
>
> ?
It raises a similar question I considered with the removal of the unused gdb
stub file in the previous round of changes. The answer I came
- Am 22. Apr 2018 um 16:54 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 9:41 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> - Joel Sherrill schrieb:
>> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 8:48 AM Sebastian Huber <
>> > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 9:41 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> - Joel Sherrill schrieb:
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 8:48 AM Sebastian Huber <
> > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > we have a lot of unused 3rd party source code
- Joel Sherrill schrieb:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 8:48 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > we have a lot of unused 3rd party source code in:
> >
> > c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4x
> > c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f7x
> >
> > This code is for BSPs
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, 8:48 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a lot of unused 3rd party source code in:
>
> c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4x
> c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f7x
>
> This code is for BSPs that never made it into the tree. For the BSP source
Hello,
we have a lot of unused 3rd party source code in:
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4x
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f7x
This code is for BSPs that never made it into the tree. For the BSP source
re-organization, should I:
1. remove these unused sources
2. move them to bsps/arm
?
--
Sebastian