On 27/08/2014 11:05 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On August 27, 2014 7:33:28 AM CDT, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hi,
On 08/27/2014 02:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 27/08/2014 3:50 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> We suggest to remove the ref_count of the task structures to save
> time and locking.
On August 27, 2014 7:33:28 AM CDT, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 08/27/2014 02:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 27/08/2014 3:50 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>>>
>>> > We suggest to remove the ref_count of the task structures to save
>>> > time and locking. Otherwise we need atomic counters
Hi,
On 08/27/2014 02:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 27/08/2014 3:50 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> We suggest to remove the ref_count of the task structures to save
> time and locking. Otherwise we need atomic counters here?
You need a means of tracking the logged references to the task data
On 27/08/2014 3:50 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> We suggest to remove the ref_count of the task structures to save
> time and locking. Otherwise we need atomic counters here?
You need a means of tracking the logged references to the task data in
the trace log. The log can exist well past th
