Re: Version Numbers

2015-09-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 11/09/2015 1:54 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On 9/10/2015 2:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> >> On 10/09/15 09:49, Pavel Pisa wrote: >>> Hello Sebastian, >>> >>> On Thursday 10 of September 2015 08:52:37 Sebastian Huber wrote: On 28/07/15 09:48, Chris Johns wrote: > Eithe

Re: Version Numbers

2015-09-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 9/10/2015 2:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 10/09/15 09:49, Pavel Pisa wrote: Hello Sebastian, On Thursday 10 of September 2015 08:52:37 Sebastian Huber wrote: On 28/07/15 09:48, Chris Johns wrote: Either scheme fits pretty well with RTEMS release cycle I think. Even if we can get dow

Re: Version Numbers

2015-09-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 10/09/15 09:49, Pavel Pisa wrote: Hello Sebastian, On Thursday 10 of September 2015 08:52:37 Sebastian Huber wrote: On 28/07/15 09:48, Chris Johns wrote: Either scheme fits pretty well with RTEMS release cycle I think. Even if we can get down to one release per year, the numbers won't gro

Re: Version Numbers

2015-09-10 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Sebastian, On Thursday 10 of September 2015 08:52:37 Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 28/07/15 09:48, Chris Johns wrote: > > Either scheme fits pretty well with RTEMS release cycle I think. > > Even if we can get down to one release per year, the numbers > > won't grow t

Re: Version Numbers

2015-09-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 28/07/15 09:48, Chris Johns wrote: Either scheme fits pretty well with RTEMS release cycle I think. Even if we can get down to one release per year, the numbers won't grow terribly fast. >>> >>>One release per year would be nice. >>> >> >>We may need more flexibility. > >

Re: Version Numbers

2015-07-28 Thread Chris Johns
On 28/07/2015 3:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > - Chris Johns schrieb: >> On 28/07/2015 6:01 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> >>> - Gedare Bloom schrieb: Extrapolating a bit, we would have: 4.11.0 release series (following old conventions) 5.0 next development version, no

Re: Version Numbers

2015-07-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Chris Johns schrieb: > On 28/07/2015 6:01 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > > - Gedare Bloom schrieb: > >> Extrapolating a bit, we would have: > >> 4.11.0 release series (following old conventions) > >> 5.0 next development version, no release > >> 5.1 next release, with 5.2, 5.3, 5.4

Re: Version Numbers

2015-07-27 Thread Chris Johns
On 28/07/2015 6:01 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > - Gedare Bloom schrieb: >> Extrapolating a bit, we would have: >> 4.11.0 release series (following old conventions) >> 5.0 next development version, no release >> 5.1 next release, with 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 as subsequent bugfix (maintenance) >> rele

Re: Version Numbers

2015-07-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Gedare Bloom schrieb: > Extrapolating a bit, we would have: > 4.11.0 release series (following old conventions) > 5.0 next development version, no release > 5.1 next release, with 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 as subsequent bugfix (maintenance) > releases > 6.0 next development version after 5.0 > 6.1 nex

Re: Version Numbers

2015-07-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Extrapolating a bit, we would have: 4.11.0 release series (following old conventions) 5.0 next development version, no release 5.1 next release, with 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 as subsequent bugfix (maintenance) releases 6.0 next development version after 5.0 6.1 next release after 5.1, with 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 as be