On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
>
> On December 13, 2014 9:47:00 PM CST, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>I'd like to see RTEMS compile with LLVM / clang. This would go a long
>>way toward improving our static analysis capabilities. The project
>>should get RTEMS compiling, and add
On December 13, 2014 9:47:00 PM CST, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>I'd like to see RTEMS compile with LLVM / clang. This would go a long
>way toward improving our static analysis capabilities. The project
>should get RTEMS compiling, and add support in RSB for it.
>
I added basic RTEMS target support t
I'd like to see RTEMS compile with LLVM / clang. This would go a long
way toward improving our static analysis capabilities. The project
should get RTEMS compiling, and add support in RSB for it.
I'm lukewarm on Coverity-Newlib. The other projects seem alright. I'll
try to take a stab at the Open
FWIW, we have a fully functional LWIP eth stack for the Beaglebone Black that
we'll contribute soon.
Maybe exploring/prototyping some dynamic checkers (specially for concurrency)
would be an option for gsoc.
--Mensaje original--
De: Joel Sherrill
Remitente: devel
Para: us...@rtems.org
Pa
