Re: Update virtio network driver

2016-11-15 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Jin-Hyun, On Tuesday 15 of November 2016 11:29:05 Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Jin-Hyun, > > thanks for update. > > I have returned from my USA holydays now and catching up > with e-mails and work backlogs. > > On Thursday 10 of November 2016 10:42:34 Jinhyun wrote: > > Hi, all! > > > > We remo

Re: Update virtio network driver

2016-11-15 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Jin-Hyun, thanks for update. I have returned from my USA holydays now and catching up with e-mails and work backlogs. On Thursday 10 of November 2016 10:42:34 Jinhyun wrote: > Hi, all! > > We removed our RTEMS-virtio driver's dependencies on architecture. We used > built-in function of gcc

RE: Update virtio network driver

2016-11-10 Thread Jinhyun
so works well when we use RTEMS_COMPILER_MEMORY_BARRIER() because the driver almost works well without any barrier, too. -Original Message- From: ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu [mailto:ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu] On Behalf Of Gedare Bloom Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 3:27 AM To: Jinhyun Cc: devel@

Re: Update virtio network driver

2016-11-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Jinhyun wrote: > Hi, all! > > We removed our RTEMS-virtio driver's dependencies on architecture. We used > built-in function of gcc, __sync_synchronize(). This function generates > proper memory barrier for target architecture on compile time. In addition, Would RT