- Am 18. Okt 2016 um 18:03 schrieb Jakob Viketoft
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com:
> Hello Pavel, Joel, Sebastian,
>
> From: Pavel Pisa [ppisa4li...@pikron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 19:09
> To: devel@rtems.org
> Cc: Jakob Viketoft; j...@rtems.org
> Subje
Hello Pavel, Joel, Sebastian,
From: Pavel Pisa [ppisa4li...@pikron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 19:09
To: devel@rtems.org
Cc: Jakob Viketoft; j...@rtems.org
Subject: Re: Time spent in ticks...
> Hello Jakob,
> ...
> the time is measured and timers queue use 64-bit types
- Am 13. Okt 2016 um 18:21 schrieb Jakob Viketoft
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com:
[...]
> Even though _Watchdog_Tick() "only" takes ~100 us now, it still sound much
> higher than your total tick with a slower system (we're running at 50 MHz).
>
> Is there anything we can do to improve thes
...@rtems.org]
> >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
> >> *To:* Jakob Viketoft
> >> *Cc:* devel@rtems.org
> >> *Subject:* Re: Time spent in ticks...
> >>
> >> >I don't have an or1k handy so ran on a sparc/erc32 simulator/
> >
*To:* Jakob Viketoft
>> *Cc:* devel@rtems.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Time spent in ticks...
>>
>> >I don't have an or1k handy so ran on a sparc/erc32 simulator/
>> >It is is a SPARC v7 at 15 Mhz.
>>
>> >These times are in microseconds and based on
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
>
> *From:* Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
> *To:* Jakob Viketoft
> *Cc:* devel@rtems.org
> *Subject:* Re: Time spent in ticks...
>
>
Hello Jakob,
On Thursday 13 of October 2016 18:21:05 Jakob Viketoft wrote:
> I re-tested my case using an -O3 optimization (we have been using -O0
> during development for debugging purposes) and I got a good performance
> boost, but I'm still nowhere near your numbers. I can vouch for that the
>
From: Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
To: Jakob Viketoft
Cc: devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: Time spent in ticks...
>I don't have an or1k handy so ran on a sparc/erc32 simulator/
>It is is a SPARC v7 at 15 Mhz.
>These times are in microseconds an
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We're running on an or1k-based BSP off of 4.11 (with the patches I've
> forwarded in February last year) and have seen some strange sluggishness in
> the system. When measuring using a st
