Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-08-01 Thread Richi Dubey
I understand. Thank you. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:00 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 5:48 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > > > Thank you for your answer. I learned ack today and it is coming pretty > handy along with cscope. > > > Note that 'grep' is more reliable, but takes a bit mo

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-31 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 5:48 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. I learned ack today and it is coming pretty handy > along with cscope. > Note that 'grep' is more reliable, but takes a bit more time to run. 'ack' filters the files that it checks, so it can miss things sometimes.

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-31 Thread Richi Dubey
Thank you for your answer. I learned ack today and it is coming pretty handy along with cscope. On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:30 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > > > I request someone to help me with my earlier question: > https://lists.rtems.org/piper

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-30 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:30 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > I request someone to help me with my earlier question: > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-July/060615.html since I may > reuse this logic of variable-sized arrays. > I guess I'll answer here.. rtems$ ack Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Conte

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-30 Thread Richi Dubey
I request someone to help me with my earlier question: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-July/060615.html since I may reuse this logic of variable-sized arrays. Thank you. On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:29 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > This information helps. Thank you. > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-18 Thread Richi Dubey
This information helps. Thank you. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:31 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 17/07/2020 14:22, Richi Dubey wrote: > > > I found the line in the documentation: "Since the processor assignment > > is independent of the thread priority the processor indices may move > > from one

Re: Thread 2: Need help in understanding exisiting RTEMS code

2020-07-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/07/2020 14:22, Richi Dubey wrote: I found the line in the documentation: "Since the processor assignment is independent of the thread priority the processor indices may move from one state to the other." This is true because the processor assignment is done by the scheduler and it gets to