Re: TEST BUILD strings

2018-01-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/01/2018 20:07, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/01/18 22:39, Chris Johns wrote: >>> This makes it easier to get the connection from the test output to the RTEMS >>> build options. >>> >> Does rtems-test need to be updated? > > The rtems-test program seems to not care about a particular TEST_BU

Re: TEST BUILD strings

2018-01-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/01/18 22:39, Chris Johns wrote: This makes it easier to get the connection from the test output to the RTEMS build options. Does rtems-test need to be updated? The rtems-test program seems to not care about a particular TEST_BUILD content: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018

Re: TEST BUILD strings

2018-01-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 19/1/18 8:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > the new test header is really great, e.g. > > *** BEGIN OF TEST BLOCK 8 *** > *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.32d50688c655fbdc4cedcf9c06972b48e1ee498f > *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS > *** TEST BUILD: legacy-net > *** TEST TOOLS: 7.2.0 20170814 (RTE

Re: TEST BUILD strings

2018-01-19 Thread Sebastian Huber
With the attached patch, the test header is now: *** BEGIN OF TEST BLOCK 6 *** *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.32d50688c655fbdc4cedcf9c06972b48e1ee498f-modified *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS *** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_DEBUG RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP *** TEST TOOLS: 7.2.0 20170814 (RTEMS 5, RS