Am 26.05.21 um 09:22 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 26/5/21 6:47 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
thanks for the detailed response. Should we add a bit of that to the doxygen
documentation of the rtems_version_* functions so that I don't ask it again
because I have forgotten it in a year?
Yes we should.
On 26/5/21 6:47 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> thanks for the detailed response. Should we add a bit of that to the doxygen
> documentation of the rtems_version_* functions so that I don't ask it again
> because I have forgotten it in a year?
Yes we should. I also would to add a detailed section
Hello Chris,
thanks for the detailed response. Should we add a bit of that to the
doxygen documentation of the rtems_version_* functions so that I don't
ask it again because I have forgotten it in a year?
Best regards
Christian
Am 26.05.21 um 01:24 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 25/5/21 8:56 pm,
On 25/5/21 8:56 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Hello,
Great question :)
> if I build a BSP on the 5 branch, I still have the following defines in
> cpuopts.h:
>
> #define RTEMS_VERSION "5.0.0"
> #define __RTEMS_MAJOR__ 5
> #define __RTEMS_MINOR__ 0
> #define __RTEMS_REVISION__ 0
>
> We are pa
