Re: RTEMS GPIO API interrupt handling

2015-07-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
On July 19, 2015 5:24:25 AM CDT, "André Marques" wrote: >On 18-07-2015 20:04, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On July 18, 2015 1:23:13 PM CDT, "André >Marques" wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> as previously pointed by Gedare, the interrupt handling code in the >>> RTEMS GPIO API can benefit with the use

Re: RTEMS GPIO API interrupt handling

2015-07-19 Thread André Marques
On 18-07-2015 20:04, Joel Sherrill wrote: On July 18, 2015 1:23:13 PM CDT, "André Marques" wrote: Hello all, as previously pointed by Gedare, the interrupt handling code in the RTEMS GPIO API can benefit with the use of a rtems interrupt server. The current design and implementation details o

Re: RTEMS GPIO API interrupt handling

2015-07-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
On July 18, 2015 1:23:13 PM CDT, "André Marques" wrote: >Hello all, > >as previously pointed by Gedare, the interrupt handling code in the >RTEMS GPIO API can benefit with the use of a rtems interrupt server. >The >current design and implementation details of the API can be seen in my >GSOC

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-21 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:04 PM, André Marques wrote: > On 16-06-2015 17:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, André Marques >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello , >>> >>> Thank you for the responses. Sorry for the late response and lengthy >>> mail. >>> >>> At this point the features

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-21 Thread André Marques
On 16-06-2015 17:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, André Marques wrote: Hello , Thank you for the responses. Sorry for the late response and lengthy mail. At this point the features mentioned in the blog post are almost done in the code (apart from some details). There

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-16 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, André Marques wrote: > Hello , > > Thank you for the responses. Sorry for the late response and lengthy mail. > > At this point the features mentioned in the blog post are almost done in the > code (apart from some details). There are some differences from what is

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-16 Thread André Marques
Hello , Thank you for the responses. Sorry for the late response and lengthy mail. At this point the features mentioned in the blog post are almost done in the code (apart from some details). There are some differences from what is mentioned in the blog, but the overall idea still stands (an b

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-11 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/06/2015 3:01 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:44 AM, André Marques >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have just updated my GSOC blog [1] with a detailed post about how a >>> rtems-wide GPIO API could look like, and at the

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 11/06/2015 3:01 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:44 AM, André Marques > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have just updated my GSOC blog [1] with a detailed post about how a >> rtems-wide GPIO API could look like, and at the same time exposing the >> current features of the Raspberry P

Re: RTEMS GPIO API

2015-06-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:44 AM, André Marques wrote: > Hello, > > I have just updated my GSOC blog [1] with a detailed post about how a > rtems-wide GPIO API could look like, and at the same time exposing the > current features of the Raspberry Pi GPIO API and how it can evolve to that > level. >