On 17/1/19 7:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> With respect to an example RTEMS application. Should we
>
> (1) suggest to check out the examples repository and start from here, or
>
> (2) should we provide a very simple Makefile based project?
>
> I tend to option (2) and just mention that the
On 17/01/2019 07:36, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/1/19 5:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
Any HTML
On 17/1/19 5:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
>>>
>>> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
>>>
>> Any HTML?
>
> https://ftp.rtems
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
Board Support Packages
The BSPs. I have been wondering if the BSP names are suitable
heading or do we want something more formal if that is even
possible?
The heading is now " ()".
This should make it easy to find.
Hmm I am not sure, for so
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
Do we want to use "tool chain" or "tool set" or "tools" for the RTEMS things
running on the host computer?
Yeah good question. A "tool chain" seems to have a meaning, a compile etc, a
"tool set" is an RSB based term and "tools" is overloaded with the rtems
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
Any HTML?
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user/index.html
As an aside in the
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
>
> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
>
Any HTML?
As an aside in the copyright block I wrote of lot of initial parts of this
manual and then have been adding pieces mo
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
On 13/01/2019 23:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/1/19 8:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
At which position in the manual should it be placed? I think we should organize
the chapters
On 11/1/19 8:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> At which position in the manual should it be placed? I think we should
> organize the chapters according to the relevance for new users and how the
> are used later during application development. I would use the RSB chapter as
> a reference chapter c
- Am 10. Jan 2019 um 0:51 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org:
> On 10/1/19 3:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I'm OK with this proposal. We used to include quite messy details about how
>> to
>> bootstrap your own GCC in the user manual. This is a bit nicer. ;) At the
>> maturity of RSB now,
On 10/1/19 3:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'm OK with this proposal. We used to include quite messy details about how
> to
> bootstrap your own GCC in the user manual. This is a bit nicer. ;) At the
> maturity of RSB now, merging the doco with the User Manual is sensible.
Agreed, this is sensibl
I'm OK with this proposal. We used to include quite messy details about
how to bootstrap your own GCC in the user manual. This is a bit nicer. ;)
At the maturity of RSB now, merging the doco with the User Manual is
sensible.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:55 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedde
12 matches
Mail list logo
