Re: RISCV BSP

2019-08-05 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:44 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Seems you will need 2 more spike to cover the suggestion 32/64 and > HW/SW FP? Yes, moreover I will need good amount of guidance too. > i also recommend you try the sis variant, for a bit more > coverage. > Okay, I will do that. For now I w

Re: RISCV BSP

2019-08-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
Seems you will need 2 more spike to cover the suggestion 32/64 and HW/SW FP? i also recommend you try the sis variant, for a bit more coverage. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Thanks a lot. > Then I will be working with "rv32imac" and "rv64imac" > > Vaibhav Gupta > > On

Re: RISCV BSP

2019-08-02 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
Thanks a lot. Then I will be working with "rv32imac" and "rv64imac" Vaibhav Gupta On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:33 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 02/08/2019 09:50, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Hello, > > I was about to test the testsuite code, need to confirm > > on

Re: RISCV BSP

2019-08-02 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/08/2019 09:50, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: Hello, I was about to test the testsuite code, need to confirm on which RISCV BSP we are going to work? For example, for ARM I was asked for xilinx-zynq So is there any specific one for riscv too, or should I build any of it? While you work on this, pl