Re: RFC ftw() Test Patch

2021-03-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 09/03/2021 21:32, Gedare Bloom wrote: My opinion is that the rolling development head is allowed to break on tool updates, and that anyone doing a bisect needs to know that they might need to rebuild/change tool versions. For a git bisect it is important that you can check out the RSB of the

Re: RFC ftw() Test Patch

2021-03-09 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:46 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> My opinion is that the rolling development head is allowed to break on >> tool updates, and that anyone doing a bisect needs to know that they >> might need to rebuild/change tool

Re: RFC ftw() Test Patch

2021-03-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > My opinion is that the rolling development head is allowed to break on > tool updates, and that anyone doing a bisect needs to know that they > might need to rebuild/change tool versions. How we actually codify > that is something else. It woul

Re: RFC ftw() Test Patch

2021-03-09 Thread Gedare Bloom
My opinion is that the rolling development head is allowed to break on tool updates, and that anyone doing a bisect needs to know that they might need to rebuild/change tool versions. How we actually codify that is something else. It would be nice if there was a way to automatically indicate the ne