On 03/09/18 14:07, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 24/08/2018 03:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I would like to propose a procedure for architecture/BSP removal since I think
the RTEMS master carries
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 24/08/2018 03:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> I would like to propose a procedure for architecture/BSP removal since I
>>> think the RTEMS master carries to much historic ballast around
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 24/08/2018 03:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> I would like to propose a procedure for architecture/BSP removal since I
>> think the RTEMS master carries to much historic ballast around with no
>> active user base.
>
> For example? We have a
On 24/08/2018 03:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I would like to propose a procedure for architecture/BSP removal since I
> think the RTEMS master carries to much historic ballast around with no active
> user base.
For example? We have a history of following gcc. Are you proposing we move away
from
