Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Hesham Moustafa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now ticker is working fine with interrupt handling, context switch
> happening as expected. The problem is that put_name() and print_time()
> are not producing any output (except for the first three instances
> before _Thread_D
Hi,
Now ticker is working fine with interrupt handling, context switch
happening as expected. The problem is that put_name() and print_time()
are not producing any output (except for the first three instances
before _Thread_Dispatch get them executing again after
_Thread_Delay_ended has been execu
The ASM macro needs to be properly used in rtems/score/cpu.h.
I sent a patch to devel@ but it is really a hack. Things compile but
I wouldn't trust it.
+ ASM should protect C only code from being used in .S code.
And vice-versa.
When I started, there was C code exposed to .S. When I blocked
off
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Hesham Moustafa
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Hesham Moustafa
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
> >> wrote:
> >> > This definitely sounds like not handling th
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I see you are kind of copying the file structure of ARM. I'm not sure
> this is a good example for a simple port. m68k is more
> straightforward.
>
Which file?
> -Gedare
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
>> wrote:
>> > This definitely sounds like not handling the context switch necessary
>> > part of the
>> > IRQ processing properly
I see you are kind of copying the file structure of ARM. I'm not sure
this is a good example for a simple port. m68k is more
straightforward.
-Gedare
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
> wrote:
> > This definitely sounds like not handling the context switch necessary
> > part of the
> > IRQ processing properly so always returning to IDLE. I call this a
> > simple return.
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 7/17/2014 4:57 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to get ticker.exe working properly for or1ksim BSP but
>> there is a problem. When I run ticker, I only get the following output
>>
>> "*** BEGIN OF TEST CLOCK TICK ***
>
On 7/17/2014 4:57 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get ticker.exe working properly for or1ksim BSP but
> there is a problem. When I run ticker, I only get the following output
>
> "*** BEGIN OF TEST CLOCK TICK ***
> TA1 - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00 12/31/1988
> TA2 - rte
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Hesham
> Moustafa
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:58 AM
> To: rtems-de...@rtems.org
> Subject: Problem with ticker.exe for or1ksim/OpenRISC BSP
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get ticker.exe working properly f
12 matches
Mail list logo
