On 2 February 2016 at 10:53, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> >Maybe we can implement
>>> >
>>> >Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>>> >https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510
>>> >
>>> >as part of this years GSoC.
>>> >
>>
>> I'
On 03/02/16 09:16, Darshit Shah wrote:
Breakpoint 1, _Thread_Set_state (the_thread=0x21a3e0, state=262144) at
>rtems-4.12/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/threadsetstate.c:39
>39_Scheduler_Acquire( the_thread, &lock_context );
>(gdb) bt
>#0 _Thread_Set_state (the_thread=0x21a3e0, state=262
8) Write up your experience as a new Tutorial on our Wiki. ;)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> >Maybe we can implement
>>> >
>>> >Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>>> >https://devel.rtems.org
On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote:
>Maybe we can implement
>
>Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510
>
>as part of this years GSoC.
>
I've already mentioned that I'd be interested in picking this up as a
potential project. How
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> On 27 January 2016 at 10:54, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>> Maybe we can implement
>>
>> Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510
>>
>> as part of this years GSoC.
>>
> I've alread
On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote:
>Maybe we can implement
>
>Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510
>
>as part of this years GSoC.
>
I've already mentioned that I'd be interested in picking this up as a
potential project. How
On 27 January 2016 at 10:54, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I added three tickets that will lead to a major improvement of the SMP
> capabilities of RTEMS in case we are able to implement them:
>
> New watchdog handler implementation
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2554
>
> Eliminate the Gia
On 28/01/16 03:29, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I added three tickets that will lead to a major improvement of the SMP
>capabilities of RTEMS in case we are able to implement them:
>
Great write-ups thanks for this. Are you planning/bu
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I added three tickets that will lead to a major improvement of the SMP
> capabilities of RTEMS in case we are able to implement them:
>
Great write-ups thanks for this. Are you planning/budgeted to implement them?
> New watchdog
