Am 20.01.23 um 06:21 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 20/1/2023 1:50 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a
little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will
it leave any artifacts be
On 20/1/2023 1:50 am, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
>> Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a
>> little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will
>> it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror?
>
Am 19.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a
little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will
it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror?
As soon as we want to get rid of the scripts again (becau
On 19.01.23 15:42, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a
little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will
it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror?
It seems by default stuff is kept for about 90 days:
https:/
Nice. I would like some time to look at this and think about it a
little more. What would be the plan for removing this capability? Will
it leave any artifacts behind in the RTEMS github mirror?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> some weeks ago I created a Gi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:05 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
>
> Hello Gedare,
>
> Am 07.02.22 um 16:40 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:20 AM Christian MAUDERER
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I received no comments for these in the last two weeks. I assume there
> >> are no
Hello Gedare,
Am 07.02.22 um 16:40 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:20 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
Hello,
I received no comments for these in the last two weeks. I assume there
are no further objections and I can push the patches to master in about
a week so that the bug is fi
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:20 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I received no comments for these in the last two weeks. I assume there
> are no further objections and I can push the patches to master in about
> a week so that the bug is fixed at least for 6.
>
Yeah, that's fine with me, th
Hello,
I received no comments for these in the last two weeks. I assume there
are no further objections and I can push the patches to master in about
a week so that the bug is fixed at least for 6.
Best regards
Christian
Am 27.01.22 um 13:25 schrieb Christian MAUDERER:
Hello,
again: What
Hello,
again: What can I do to make the patches acceptable?
Best regards
Christian
Am 21.01.22 um 11:57 schrieb Christian MAUDERER:
Ping.
Am 18.01.22 um 12:22 schrieb Christian MAUDERER:
Hello,
I noted that I still have this patch set open. I first posted it in
August 2021 and later pinge
Ping.
Am 18.01.22 um 12:22 schrieb Christian MAUDERER:
Hello,
I noted that I still have this patch set open. I first posted it in
August 2021 and later pinged it in September 2021. Both times no
conclusion has been found. I would like to finally finish this topic and
get the patches in an ac
Hello,
I noted that I still have this patch set open. I first posted it in
August 2021 and later pinged it in September 2021. Both times no
conclusion has been found. I would like to finally finish this topic and
get the patches in an acceptable state. To simplify it a bit, let's only
discuss
Hello Chris,
Am 27.09.21 um 10:51 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 27/9/21 6:24 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Yeap and so we need to resolve it.
I have reordered your original post so the chat follows. I hope that is OK?
O
On 27/9/21 6:24 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Yeap and so we need to resolve it.
I have reordered your original post so the chat follows. I hope that is OK?
> Is there still an open point left of can I push the patche
Hello,
same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Chris: Back when I posted the patch set you mentioned that you are not
entirely happy about it in a discord chat (about 17.08.2021 6:50 in UTC
time zone). Is there still an open point left of can I push the pat
Hello Gedare,
Am 17.11.20 um 18:33 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
Everything except 5 looks good. I or someone else should take a closer
look at that.
Thanks for the review.
I noted that I most likely have to rework the MPU setup a bit. A table
based approach (similar to the one used for ARMV7_CP15 b
Everything except 5 looks good. I or someone else should take a closer
look at that.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 4:04 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the following patches add a BSP for IMXRT1050-EVKB. In case the import
> patch is too big: I pushed the patches here too:
>
> https://gitla
Dear Rtems Developers,
since I have sent the patches too early without testing and verifying
them, I apologize about this mistake.
Please ignore the patches which I have sent today.
I will send new patches as soon as I finish testing them.
Sorry about this inconvenience !
Best regards,
Aschr
Hello Gedare,
On 15/04/2020 18:23, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:31 AM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
>>
>> On 15/04/2020 15:56, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> Yes, go ahead and push them in.
>>
>> Thanks. I pushed them. But now I have a small problem: I wanted to
>> update RSB to use the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:31 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2020 15:56, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > Yes, go ahead and push them in.
>
> Thanks. I pushed them. But now I have a small problem: I wanted to
> update RSB to use the new versions (Chris said in another mail that it
> should be up
On 15/04/2020 15:56, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Yes, go ahead and push them in.
Thanks. I pushed them. But now I have a small problem: I wanted to
update RSB to use the new versions (Chris said in another mail that it
should be up to date that near to a release). But I noted that I have no
idea what fo
Yes, go ahead and push them in.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:07 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2020 07:06, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Hello Christian,
> >
> > the patch set looks good (except maybe "[PATCH rtems-libbsd v2 09/14]
> > bus-dma, imx: Don't sync nocache area.").
> >
>
> Thank
On 15/04/2020 07:06, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> the patch set looks good (except maybe "[PATCH rtems-libbsd v2 09/14]
> bus-dma, imx: Don't sync nocache area.").
>
Thanks.
Chris, Gedare, Joel: Would it be OK for you if I push the patches before
the release?
Best regards
Chr
Hello Christian,
the patch set looks good (except maybe "[PATCH rtems-libbsd v2 09/14]
bus-dma, imx: Don't sync nocache area.").
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
just noted another bug that happened during rebase: Not all steps in
libbsd are compileable. Please see the libbsd stuff as a draft version.
The content won't change but the order of the patches has to.
Best regards
Christian
On 02/04/2020 16:41, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> t
25 matches
Mail list logo
