Hello,
now i've read through a bit of code. Isn't _Thread_queue_Operations_FIFO
respectively _Thread_queue_Do_nothing_priority_actions more suitable for
me than _Thread_queue_Operations_priority with priority_actions
_Thread_queue_Priority_priority_actions?
Best regards
Malte
On 15.11.18 17:05,
ok, thanks a lot, i will have a look into that.
Best regards,
Malte
On 15.11.18 17:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I think with this change you get something similar (priority inheritance
> is also disabled):
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/mrspimpl.h
> b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/mrs
I think with this change you get something similar (priority inheritance
is also disabled):
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/mrspimpl.h
b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/mrspimpl.h
index b9c7441401..4b69d6c68b 100644
--- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/mrspimpl.h
+++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/scor
I mean something like:
while (resource blocked) {
// nothing
}
instead of
while (resource blocked) {
// help other tasks
}
On 15.11.18 16:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 15/11/2018 16:42, Malte Münch wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i am fiddling around with the mrsp-implementation for a w
On 15/11/2018 16:42, Malte Münch wrote:
Hello,
i am fiddling around with the mrsp-implementation for a while now. But
until now i am not able to divide the codeparts and understand what each
thing is doing. I am particularly interested in the part where the
helping mechanism is enabled. I want t
Hello,
i am fiddling around with the mrsp-implementation for a while now. But
until now i am not able to divide the codeparts and understand what each
thing is doing. I am particularly interested in the part where the
helping mechanism is enabled. I want to replace it in a way that the
task is idl
On 13/11/2018 09:58, Malte Münch wrote:
ok, so if i get this right _Thread_Dispatch_disable() and disabling of
interrupts both ensure that the current thread is not preempted and can
continue its spinning as it is waiting for its resource. As is seems to
me _Thread_Dispatch_disable is the better
On 13/11/2018 09:37, Malte Münch wrote:
Good morning Sebastian,
thanks for your quick answer. Thanks for your hint on where to look for
the locking. I think i will need some time to understand what each macro
is doing.
My plan with the rtems_task_mode() call was to start there and trace
down to
Good morning Sebastian,
thanks for your quick answer. Thanks for your hint on where to look for
the locking. I think i will need some time to understand what each macro
is doing.
My plan with the rtems_task_mode() call was to start there and trace
down to the according kernel call.
I will try th
Hello Malte,
On 12/11/2018 11:28, Malte Münch wrote:
Hi,
i am implementing a new resource sharing protocol for RTEMS as part of
my bachelor thesis. The thesis is about resource sharing protocols in
realtime environments on multicore systems. Right now i have to use a
spinlock for a protocol and
10 matches
Mail list logo
