Re: GNU ld --wrap limitations

2019-01-16 Thread Chris Johns
On 16/1/19 12:10 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > On 15/1/19 5:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> You need an undefined reference to a symbol. References inside a translation >> unit are apparently not undefined references. > > Does DWARF give us any better insight and the information needed? > My work to

Re: GNU ld --wrap limitations

2019-01-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 15/1/19 5:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 14/01/2019 23:33, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 14/1/19 8:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> while testing the event recording with the libbsd I noticed a GNU ld --wrap >>> limitation: >>> >>> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-12/msg00210.html >>>

Re: GNU ld --wrap limitations

2019-01-14 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 14/01/2019 23:33, Chris Johns wrote: On 14/1/19 8:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: while testing the event recording with the libbsd I noticed a GNU ld --wrap limitation: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-12/msg00210.html I have been watching the thread. There is a limit to what bin

Re: GNU ld --wrap limitations

2019-01-14 Thread Chris Johns
On 14/1/19 8:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > while testing the event recording with the libbsd I noticed a GNU ld --wrap > limitation: > > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-12/msg00210.html > I have been watching the thread. There is a limit to what binutils or any method can do as