Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-28 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Joel, some quick (off the cuff) responses to your Qs: > > Assuming formal verification benefits from modular decomposition like software > construction and admitting I don't know how you plan to go about this, I would > tend to look at the APIs of interest and then look at what score > objec

Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:50 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > On 27/08/2019 16:58, Andrew Butterfield wrote: > > Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers, > > > > I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity, > > and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how form

Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Andrew, On 27/08/2019 16:58, Andrew Butterfield wrote: Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers, I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity, and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how formal verification techniques can help. We will not "formally prove" all of RTE