On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:53 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:53 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:59 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:39 PM Ged
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:53 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:59 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 AM Joe
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:53 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:59 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
Hi
There are more than a couple of
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:59 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> There are more than a couple of these. in our set of CIDs. I am
>>> wondering if these can be addresse
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> There are more than a couple of these. in our set of CIDs. I am wondering
>> if these can be addressed with a macro like this:
>>
>> #define _IGNORED_RETURN_STATUS(_status
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:24 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> There are more than a couple of these. in our set of CIDs. I am wondering
> if these can be addressed with a macro like this:
>
> #define _IGNORED_RETURN_STATUS(_status, _ok) \
> do { \
> _Assert((_status) == (_ok)); \
>
Can you