Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 9/9/20 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09/09/2020 02:29, Chris Johns wrote: >>> This would be enough to address my "HW or which simulator" question. >> I had created #4072, please update adding the items you would like. We can >> add >> anything you like and they can be mandated. There alr

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 9/9/20 6:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09/09/2020 02:36, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 9/9/20 3:13 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:55 PM Chris Johns  wrote: An example using Joel's recent test run (thanks Joel :)). The sparc/leon2 results show no regressions:

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-09 Thread Christian Mauderer
On 09/09/2020 02:29, Chris Johns wrote: [...] > >> > Also I am not sure but hopefully the test reports do accurately reflect >> host OS. >> >> There is a "Host" section at the top of the results log? It is just >> `uname -a`. >> >> I think that's sufficient as long as it can distingui

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 09/09/2020 02:29, Chris Johns wrote: This would be enough to address my "HW or which simulator" question. I had created #4072, please update adding the items you would like. We can add anything you like and they can be mandated. There already exist a number of fields for various transports so

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 09/09/2020 02:36, Chris Johns wrote: On 9/9/20 3:13 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: An example using Joel's recent test run (thanks Joel :)). The sparc/leon2 results show no regressions: Summary === Passed:580 Failed: 0 User I

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Chris, On 07/09/2020 04:55, Chris Johns wrote: Hello, I would like to discuss BSP Test results early in the release cycle in the hope we avoid the last minute issues we encountered with RTEMS 5 and the "expected" failure state ticket. I would like to update this section ... https://docs

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-08 Thread Chris Johns
On 9/9/20 3:13 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> An example using Joel's recent test run (thanks Joel :)). The sparc/leon2 >> results show no regressions: >> >> Summary >> === >> >> Passed:580 >> Failed: 0 >> User Input: 6 >> E

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-08 Thread Chris Johns
On 9/9/20 8:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:44 AM Chris Johns > wrote: > On 7/9/20 2:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020, 9:55 PM Chris Johns > >

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:44 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 7/9/20 2:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020, 9:55 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to discuss BSP Test results early in the release cycle > in the hope >

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-08 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to discuss BSP Test results early in the release cycle in the > hope > we avoid the last minute issues we encountered with RTEMS 5 and the "expected" > failure state ticket. > > I would like to update this section ... >

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-06 Thread Chris Johns
On 7/9/20 2:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020, 9:55 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to discuss BSP Test results early in the release cycle in > the hope > we avoid the last minute issues we encountered with RTEMS 5 a

Re: BSP Test Results

2020-09-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020, 9:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to discuss BSP Test results early in the release cycle in the > hope > we avoid the last minute issues we encountered with RTEMS 5 and the > "expected" > failure state ticket. > > I would like to update this section ... > >