Re: [rtems commit] build: Fix linker path

2020-09-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/09/2020 07:03, Chris Johns wrote: In the long run, the GCC defined start files should be provided by GCC.  This is a GCC 11 topic. It would have been good to discuss this. Without this patch its not possible to use powerpc BSPs. Now the rtems-examples build for all BSPs with some ENOMEM e

Re: [rtems commit] build: Fix linker path

2020-09-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/9/20 2:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/09/2020 01:06, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 21/9/20 1:32 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Use -B for the linker since some architectures use extra start files >>> defined by >>> the GCC specification and provided by the BSP, for example powerpc.  Start

Re: [rtems commit] build: Fix linker path

2020-09-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/09/2020 01:06, Chris Johns wrote: On 21/9/20 1:32 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: Use -B for the linker since some architectures use extra start files defined by the GCC specification and provided by the BSP, for example powerpc. Start files are not found by -L. This is the issue I was think

Re: [rtems commit] build: Fix linker path

2020-09-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/9/20 1:32 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Use -B for the linker since some architectures use extra start files defined > by > the GCC specification and provided by the BSP, for example powerpc. Start > files are not found by -L. This is the issue I was thinking about when we discussed the spe