I updated the Interface (header) in my draft. Could you take a look at the
improved version?
https://github.com/c-mauderer/civetweb/compare/1e4a9ee...a6bea13
Please note: I only updated the interface not the implementation. I will do
that as soon as we have agreed on the interface.
Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016 23:26:07 UTC+2 schrieb bel:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 11:04:44 AM UTC+2, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>
>>
>> I created a draft for a callback. It's not worked out and only thought as
>> a basis for further discussions:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/c-mauderer/ci
To the question from Joe Mucchiello:
I think the thread startup is more a toppic of the init_thread callback
that has been added here: https://github.com/civetweb/civetweb/pull/304
This function gets called after the thread is started. Is this what you had
in mind?
To bel:
I created a d
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2016 21:07:46 UTC+2 schrieb bel:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 7:50:02 AM UTC+2, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>
>>
>> The solution with the *start_thread* callback is quite a different
>> approach than my original one but it looks like a quite portable solution.
>>
>> Am
At first: Sorry that I didn't react for such a long time. I just didn't
find the time for working on that problem. I had some lengthy discussion on
the RTEMS mailing list regarding the update to civetweb (or to be exact:
where to put it) without a final solution. Therefore the update is
current
Am 02.05.2016 um 20:35 schrieb bel:
>
>
> On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 10:39:13 AM UTC+2, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>> I agree that eventually not all variations have to be tested. It's only
>> a challange to identify the irrelevant ones.
>>
>> Does the Travic CI allow to exclude certain combinatio
Am 27.04.2016 um 23:44 schrieb bel:
>
>
> What do you think of the solution of ignoring parameters?
>
>
> Ignoring parameters on a certain platform feels like
> "Error: parameter xyz does not work on platform ..."
>
> If the parameter exists, it is supposed to work.
>
>
>
> Or a
I've got some feedback on the RTEMS mailinglist (part of
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-April/014729.html):
Am 27.04.2016 um 02:07 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> I already contacted the civetweb author regarding two of the patches.
>> One was a new one (civetweb now uses a timegm function
Hello,
I'm currently try to replace our mongoose port with a current version of
civetweb. Civetweb is a fork of the last MIT licensed version of
mongoose that is still maintained under the MIT license.
To reduce the number of patches that are necessary, I tried to clean up
the patch that allows s
