Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/15 13:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 7/23/2015 6:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it i

Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 7/23/2015 6:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it is working for a release. Oh and it has docu

Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it is working for a release. Oh and it has documentation. For an API I suggest to use C11/C++