Martin,
Please send a v4 that applies over Sudarshan's patch (attached). Then
we can commit both.
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Is there a v4 missing?
>
>
> On 14/09/15 23:49, Martin Galvan wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch com
Is there a v4 missing?
On 14/09/15 23:49, Martin Galvan wrote:
Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch commited?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
wro
Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch commited?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
> wrote:
>> On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>>
>>> On
Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
>>
On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
+1
Sounds fair enough! :) Thanks for the support, Daniel. Should I make a
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
> with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
+1
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Gutson
> wrote:
>> Side question to Joel and others: is this enough t
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
> with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
Agreed. Sudarshan sent his patch a couple days ago; I'll generate a
new one with the new instructions and the comments
I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Gutson
wrote:
> Side question to Joel and others: is this enough to credit Sudarshan?
> He did an amazing job for finding the bug and p
Side question to Joel and others: is this enough to credit Sudarshan?
He did an amazing job for finding the bug and proposing an initial
solution.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Martin Galvan
wrote:
> On exception entry, _ARMV7M_Exception_default stores the previous Stack
> Pointer
> in a CPU
