Hello Chris,
On 2023-02-07 05:42, Chris Johns wrote:
On 6/2/2023 7:07 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Hello Chris,
thanks for your feedback on the patch.
No problem :)
On 2023-02-06 05:16, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/2/2023 6:31 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
This patch tries to make the most i
On 6/2/2023 7:07 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> thanks for your feedback on the patch.
No problem :)
> On 2023-02-06 05:16, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 3/2/2023 6:31 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>> This patch tries to make the most important goals of LibBSD development
>>> more
On 2/6/23 05:16, Chris Johns wrote:
+ * A lot of different hardware uses LibBSD as network or USB stack or maybe
in
+ the future even only for other subsystems. Some of the targets have
+ hundreds of megabytes memory. Others can only have a few megabytes (like
+ the ATSAMV71). M
Hello Chris,
thanks for your feedback on the patch.
On 2023-02-06 05:16, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/2/2023 6:31 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
This patch tries to make the most important goals of LibBSD development
more clear based on the results of the discussion on the mailing list:
https://lis
On 06.02.23 05:16, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/2/2023 6:31 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
This patch tries to make the most important goals of LibBSD development
more clear based on the results of the discussion on the mailing list:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-January/074164.html
On 3/2/2023 6:31 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> This patch tries to make the most important goals of LibBSD development
> more clear based on the results of the discussion on the mailing list:
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-January/074164.html
> ---
> CONTRIBUTING.rst | 39
