Re: [PATCH 2/2] bsp/tms570 Use bitfields instead of hard-coded values

2015-07-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On July 17, 2015 12:22:14 PM CDT, Pavel Pisa wrote: >Hello Joel, > >I have been with Premek when he tested these on the target. > >[PATCH 1/2] bsp/tms570: skipped 32bit field definitions and corrected >single bit fields > This one clean header files. There has been unnecessary defines > of w

Re: [PATCH 2/2] bsp/tms570 Use bitfields instead of hard-coded values

2015-07-17 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Joel, I have been with Premek when he tested these on the target. [PATCH 1/2] bsp/tms570: skipped 32bit field definitions and corrected single bit fields This one clean header files. There has been unnecessary defines of whole registers as fields and mistake in single bit definitions

Re: [PATCH 2/2] bsp/tms570 Use bitfields instead of hard-coded values

2015-07-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
I am about to leave for a week. If these are OK, they need to be committed to the master and 4.11 branch please. On 7/17/2015 10:04 AM, Premysl Houdek wrote: Signed-off-by: Premysl Houdek --- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/tms570/clock/clock.c | 31 +++- .../lib/libbsp/arm/tms