Hi Jan,
I think it is a correct analysis of the bad return value, when using
shared interrupt routines on the same interrupt source. I'm fine with
the patch, maybe it could have been simplified, like this:
+++ b/bsps/shared/grlib/irq/genirq.c
@@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ static int genirq_set_active(
Does someone have any objections to this patch?
I would like to push it to master and 5.
Or should we reach out to someone at Gaisler to check if it is ok?
Best regards,
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: devel On Behalf Of
> gabriel.moy...@dlr.de
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 10:09
Is this a bug in rtems 5 also?
If so, does it warrant a back-port fix and a ticket?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:16 AM Moyano, Gabriel wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've found what can be an issue in the function genirq_set_active(): under
> some conditions it can return a value greater than 1.
>
