On 09.02.23 01:44, Chris Johns wrote:
On 7/2/2023 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more he
On 7/2/2023 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
>> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
>
> A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more helpful would be a
> consistency
On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more helpful would be
a consistency check before patch sets are pulled in. For example, it
On 2/6/2023 4:09 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
I'll see if I can find an appropriate place for it to go in that
document. Some parts of it are aspirational and apply to any build
system
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:02 PM Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> The objxilinxsupport build object was accidentally included twice in
> some of the ZynqMP BSPs by two different drivers that req