Hesham*
Sorry for the typo !
-Message d'origine-
De : BAILLIEZ Damien
Envoyé : mardi 4 mai 2021 10:16
À : 'Hesham Almatary'
Cc : devel@rtems.org
Objet : RE: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark
Hello Heshman,
Yes I only use Make.
-Message d'ori
Hello Heshman,
Yes I only use Make.
-Message d'origine-
De : H.M.K. Almatary De la part de Hesham Almatary
Envoyé : vendredi 30 avril 2021 19:39
À : BAILLIEZ Damien
Cc : devel@rtems.org
Objet : Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark
Hello Damien,
Glad to know you ha
Hello Damien,
Glad to know you have an interest in it. Yes, we needed to add Make
support for it, I just didn't get to work on that yet. Do you need to
exclusively use Make and not waf though?
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 16:50, BAILLIEZ Damien wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’ve seen in the Archives that
Hi all,
I've seen in the Archives that the discussion about adding the CoreMark
Benchmark ended a few weeks ago on the subject of Make support, which greatly
interests me.
Does someone involved with this know if there has been any progress ?
Regards,
Damien
__
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 6:02 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 5:53 AM Hesham Almatary
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Gedare,
>>
>> Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed
>> Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered
>> supporting it.
>>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 5:53 AM Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
> Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed
> Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered
> supporting it.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-examples/blob/983926a7e519be85f630
Hello Gedare,
Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed
Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered
supporting it.
[1]
https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-examples/blob/983926a7e519be85f630c620430e7e1ac3e0f4ea/README.Makefile#L32
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 1
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 23:38, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I don't see any RTEMS specific instructions added. Especially
> since I think you need them to deal with the submodule.
>
I relied on the existing README.waf which gives instructions to init
and update submodules (including rtems-waf itself be
Hi Hesham,
Nice work getting this integrated in the upstream. I guess that the
git submodule instructions for building with waf will work for this,
but not Make. How hard would it be for you to integrate the submodule
with Make?
This is fine with me as-is, I just want to know if we can keep it
su
I don't see any RTEMS specific instructions added. Especially
since I think you need them to deal with the submodule.
What happens when you haven't dealt with the submodule? Is the
error reasonable? I would think a directory is missing and the waf
build will die.
I am thrilled to see these added.
10 matches
Mail list logo