Yes. uMon supports at least m68k and ARM in addition to MIPS.
So the question is does a file go in bsps/shared based on potential
designed use or
actual current use in the tree?
--joel
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:23 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> There was some effort expended to get it working with Be
There was some effort expended to get it working with Beaglebone:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/BeagleBSPPortingUmon
I don't know if this ever made it to primetime. We also set up some RTEMS
Project repos and mailing lists to support umon, since it lacks its own
community. https://git.rte
On 07/03/2019 13:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Umon if not MIPS specific even if that is the only bsp we have using it
So, this code is intended to be used by several BSPs?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax
Umon if not MIPS specific even if that is the only bsp we have using it
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 2:46 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> They are only used by the csb337 BSP.
> ---
> bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/rtems/umon.h | 0
> bsps/{ => arm/csb337}/include/umon
