Okay! So first let me check what files are updated till now.
On Sat, 8 Jun, 2019, 1:00 AM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> I wouldn't send the patch, I would suggest you write an email to
> discuss about how you are porting ndbm, and that the current version
> relies on the search/hash functions, and that
I wouldn't send the patch, I would suggest you write an email to
discuss about how you are porting ndbm, and that the current version
relies on the search/hash functions, and that the interface has
changed a bit over time so inquire whether you should update
hash/search functions to newer versions.
Sure! I will send the patch to newlib and ask them if they need updated set
of files inside libc/search.
On Fri, 7 Jun, 2019, 10:29 PM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:02 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel.
> >
> > On Fr
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:02 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>
> Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel.
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:22 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h| 86 ++
>> newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 4 +-
>> newlib/libc
Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:22 AM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
> ---
> newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h| 86 ++
> newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 4 +-
> newlib/libc/posix/ndbm.c | 214 ++
> 3 f
When I checked further, libc/posix/Makefile.am
INCLUDES is the old name for AM_CPPFLAGS, hence I added the new path in it.
.
INCLUDES = $(NEWLIB_CFLAGS) $(CROSS_CFLAGS) $(TARGET_CFLAGS)
-I$(top_srcdir)/search
.
.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.or
